Corporate Parley's

On: We recommend some additional reliability tasks, we have not quite followed good design principles of using , it is supposed to be used for but I suspect some unscrupulous use for which is highly deprecated ... am not quite sure tho the extent to which this is prevalent ... but at the same time not sure how much problems these things are addition up to ... we would like to have those revisited again and make any changes

Off: Okei, how would you like to priorotize this one? High, Med, Trivial?

On: Well, its not all that important but we could do that for we have deviated from some design principles, so keep that a bit lower than Med

Off: Fine, well take that up, tho we ain't sure when, but will schedule it for later

hmm ... luks like no one is sure what to do ... almost as if they are doing things just to keep themselves buzy ... 1st they err ... then they are not sure if those foibles are really having any effect ... neither sure if getting them out of the way would be of any help ... #-o ... absolutely hilarious ... aimless pursuits ... never sure of results

casuality ... effect of having ineffectual individuals (including myself), or rather inept people to chip off the rough edges of a statue ... a dilettante would proly only end up screwing up the statue against expected ... ending up making it look like more skilled work is required to patch things up ... but again putting in the unskilled for the task ... what a viscious cycle ... guess uncertainity is something I have least tolerance for ... n I guess it works for them ... good 4 them